Another dog sentenced to die in the McGuinty Gulag

UPDATE!!! The Ontario Attorney General's Office apparently ILLEGALLY using copyrighted breed standards to kill dogs! Read it on Caveat! And see pictures of Munchie!!! I want whatever drugs Toronto Animal Services and the AG's office were on when they turned Munchie into a "pit bull"!

Lab owners, reinforce your doors, they're coming for you next!

==========================================================

Read it and weep.

In short - A woman lives near a man who allegedly repeatedly made threats, tried to kill her dog, broke down her door and held her at knifepoint, and Toronto Animal Services spends tax dollars to kill her dog as quickly as possible.

If you own property of a certain shape, a dog, you are a second-class citizen in the Dictatorship of Ontario. Especially if you're a woman, young, or without a certain income (aka poor).

Regardless of the fact that you are a law-abiding citizen who has never done wrong, you have fewer rights than a pedophile, drug dealer, or a violent lunatic who repeatedly threatens you, tries to kill your dog, breaks down your door and holds you at knifepoint.

Your "property of a certain shape" - your dog - can be a Lab, a boxer, a mastiff, a Great Dane, a Shar-Pei, a Rhodesian Ridgeback or any one of dozens of breeds. That doesn't begin to include the crossed and mixed breed dogs of uncertain heritage that people may claim are "pit bulls".

Remember that former Attorney General Michael Bryant, the architect of Ontario's breed ban, was unable to identify the American Pit Bull Terrier in a series of pictures of purebred dogs.

The McGuinty Liberals passed an unfounded, unjust, vague and shoddy law bolstered only by inflammatory rhetoric and repudiated by all qualified canine experts, at a time when the party's public appeal was very low.

The McGuinty Liberals ignored the canine experts who said this law was wrong, and ignored the common-sense advice for improving public safety with regards to dogs.

As we can see in this case, the McGuinty and Bryant law did not protect this woman or her property. In fact, it will deprive her of her property by killing her dog, because under this law anyone who owns a dog of a certain shape is a second-class citizen.

The McGuinty Liberals are responsible for this woman's terror and her dog's death. For making law-abiding people into second-class citizens and targets of legislated harassment and assault, based solely on the shape of property they own.

Whenever I see a picture of McGuinty or Bryant, I can see the blood on their hands. Only and all for political ambition.

Montreal Gazette hits one out of the park

An editor at the Montreal Gazette has written a wonderful editorial...the clarity of vision and understanding is heartening. You can read it here.

Ville-Marie, Montreal must be short of oxygen

Read it and weep. The morons are taking over the earth. There's a problem with irresponsible dog owners, so the good burghers of Ville-Marie want to ban a broad spectrum of dogs, and make their law-abiding owners into second-class citizens.

Of course, they're going to rush it through. Let's not learn from the experience of experts and other jurisdictions where breed-specific legislation has failed, including Ontario.

Allowing the police to shoot a dog on sight??? Is that going to include shooting your dog just because of its shape??? They'd better have lots of liability insurance for the bystanders who will undoubtedly be hit by stray bullets. And possibly killed.

Whatever happened to democracy? To all being equal under the law?

It's being crushed under the bootheel of political ambition and animal "rights" extremists who want to end pet ownership.

And braindead, complacent Canadians just bend over and take it. Start yelling, people, before the rights people fought and died for, are gone. Forever. Just like our pets.

Is Mikey on Dalton's *hit list?

First, Mikey Bryant gets demoted (commonly acknowledged, regardless of Fibspin). Now, this from the Toronto Star...

[snip]A 2003 report for the Attorney-General has identified serious problems in the province’s special prosecutions unit, including lack of experience and resources.

Those problems may have helped cause the collapse of the corruption case against six Toronto police officers, say those familiar with the unit. [end snip]

Hmmm. What was Mighty Mikey doing in 2003? Why, chasing his tail to get his "pit bull" ban passed, of course.

This report was issued during Mikey's watch, for his ministry. I wonder how badly he's going to get slagged in the very near future...because Dalton doesn't seem to take kindly to usurpers. Notice how quiet Mikey's been lately? Who glued the cork in his mouth and put the bag over his head to end the photo ops?

I wait with bated breath and anticipation of much amusement.

While we wait, a lovely piece on Caveat entitled Every Now And Then, Someone Comes Along. Read it here.

Peta-crites pimping shelter animals again

Peta has mucho dinero to spend on television advertisements in NYC and other locales irrationally and unjustifiably slandering the American Kennel Club.

Peta-crites, why don't you spend that money to rescue some of the "millions of unwanted animals in shelters" that you keep pimping to fill your coffers?

Oh. I forgot. Peta just kills "unwanted" animals. God forbid that the animals should be rehomed and live long and happy lives as pampered pets. Peta wants to end your right to own a pet, and thinks that an animal's only "right" is to die at the end of a Peta needle.

As you may have guessed, I despise Peta.

I depise the hypocrisy of their leaders, the lies and prevarications, the hidden agendas.

I despise Peta for sucking money out of the unwary and misusing it.

I despise Peta for killing 97% of the animals surrendered to it...that doesn't include the ones Peta employees lie to obtain, then kill and dump.

I despise Peta for spending millions on "consultants", and a considerable sum for a huge freezer to store the bodies of animals it kills.

I despise Peta for being dishonest; it's not a charity, it's a political lobby.

This ad against the AKC is just another example of Peta dishonesty, manipulation and misuse of individual donations which good-hearted people thought would go to animal welfare, not to promoting Peta's hidden agenda.